I had my first experience with moot court this week. My
Torts professor arranged for a local lawyer to come argue a case before a handful
of “judges” (law professors or similar) in W&M’s courtroom. It gave him an
opportunity to practice an appellate case he’s working on, and it gave my class
a taste of a real courtroom case. Our guest argued the plaintiff’s side and my
professor argued the defendant’s.
It was interesting to listen to. Shortly into the lawyer’s arguments,
the judges interrupted with questions. The end result, rather than a TV lawyer
type speech, was a four on one conversation with the judges pushing as hard as
they could (in a respectful, dignified way) against the lawyer’s rationale. Of
course, my professor received the same treatment. It’s kind of odd to hear the
judges suddenly switch their arguments to the other side. And it gave my brain
a good workout in trying to keep up.
It was a good illustration of the unknown, grey areas in the
law. In fact, there is very seldom a black-and-white “right” answer in law
school. The answer is usually maybe. Or probably. Or “we think this is what it
means.” Or, “we’re not sure and it would be really nice if the Supreme Court
would clarify this for us.” My Torts professor has told us repeatedly, “If you
came to law school looking for answers, you might as well head right back out
the door.”
And it actually makes sense to have all that fuzzy grey area.
If there is a black and white answer, you don’t need a lawyer. As another
professor mentioned early in the semester, no one hires a lawyer to tell them
what the speed limit is.
Maybe that’s why law school feels so different from other
academic endeavors. It’s not about learning facts and knowing answers. The
lawyer’s harvest is greater when there are more grey areas.
Switching gears away from the law school front, we had a
Relief Society activity on Saturday where I tried to live up to my name and
quilt a few stitches on a ward service project quilt (I was pretty slow – I prefer
tying quilts to the stitching part).
I’ve also taken to watching Studio C (on YouTube). The
comedy is a little over the top sometimes, but it feels good to laugh and it’s
nice to watch something lighthearted after reading casebooks (especially the criminal
law one).
Outside, a bunch of leaves have now fallen off the trees.
There are so many still on the branches that it’s hardly made a dent, but there
are certainly rake-able quantities. Leaf blowers are showing up on campus. The
trees are generally still green, but perhaps a little less vibrant than before.
So I guess fall has arrived. Maybe.
Geese on the lake closest to my apartment. |
My new cutting board (etched glass from yesterday's RS activity). |
I like your cutting board and the Q font type, it's a pretty Q that actually looks like a Q and not a 2, great choice. I hope once larger quantitites of leaves fall you'll get a chance to jump in them or perhaps just crunch a bunch under your feet. Do you ever feed the geese? I think it is so cool that the lawyer took the opportunity to practice the case and give you a great learning expereience at the same time. If I needed a lawyer, I'd want one who'd be willing to practice before the real deal in court.
ReplyDelete